Translate

Tuesday, 29 March 2016

"Khalistan"- The political Awakening-Story of India's Fault Lines

CONTINUATION OF AN EARLIER ARTICLE ON THE SAME TOPIC OF "KHALISTAN"
http://whatholdsthefuture.blogspot.com/2015/08/global-resurgence-of-khalistan-movement.html

The political pundits and gurus of India knows for a fact that "Khalistan" issue is going to be a big factor in the 2017 elections at Indian Punjab. The resurgence of Khalistan post 2012 is the biggest headache for the Indian union after India forcibly quashed the movement in 1984 "operation Blue Star". Thousands of Indian Sikh youth joined the cause of Khalistan calling for a separate state for the Sikhs of Indian Punjab as a result of the mass killing of Sikh separatists in 1984 through military action by Indian Army. These Sikh youth were persecuted by the Indian state while most flee to Canada and UK to seek political asylum there. Indian government did not spare even those Sikh separatist living abroad like prominent Khalistan movement leader Harpal Singh Cheema who spent half of his life in jails across India and California on charges of supporting Khalistan. However, such Sikhs like Harpal Singh Cheema after getting out from jail regrouped and launched a political struggle for Khalistan yet again in India. The Khalistan movement has a mega support base in Canada and Europe on account of Sikhs forced to settle there as political refugees of Khalistan cause escaping persecution by the Indian state. The UK most recently lifted the 15 year old ban on the International Sikh Youth Federation(ISYF), an international organization of Sikhs working for the creation of Sikh independent state in India. ISYF was banned by western countries including Japan under the terrorism laws. The lifting of ISYF ban in the UK will give an immense boost to the Khalistan cause around the globe having its direct implications in India.

 Khalistan is expected to become the biggest fault-line of the Indian union in near future. Indian state has itself to blame for bringing the situation to where it stands now. The decision by Indra Gandhi, the slain Indian Prime Minister to take the Sikh insurgency head on using ruthless force at Punjab in the early 1980s proved highly counterproductive. It not only turned the undecided Sikh youth in favour of an independent Sikh state, Khalistan, but Indra Gandhi also had to pay for her authoritarian decisions with her life, while her official Sikh body guards shot her in broad day light at her own residence. That proved yet again, that one man's terrorist is another man's hero. After almost three decades the once forcibly quashed independence movement of the Indian Sikh society is seeing an unprecedented resurgence. The Indian state reply to the political awakening at Indian Punjab is typical while they blame Pakistan for exporting drugs and supporting Indian Sikh militancy for the cause of Khalistan. However, there is a huge grey area in the Indian justification for the global resurgence of Khalistan. The Khalistan cause and its resurgence is almost non violent and very much political in nature. If history of sub-continent teaches us a lesson, first would be that the cause of partition of united India in 1947 was a result of a mass political movement after militancy failed to achieve the same. Indian union beside these  fault-lines in Kashmir, Nagaland, Manipur, Tripura, Aassam and Mizoram have a serious issue in Punjab. While the earlier stated areas are easily controlled by India through their draconian law allowing any number of human rights violations known as Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA), Punjab is all together a different ball game. Application of AFSPA is the least likely option for Punjab. As a dominant majority of Indian Army fighting strength belong to the Sikh community and considering their previous reaction to military action in Punjab resulting in the murder of their Prime Minister by her Sikh bodyguards, Indian government and Army will think more then twice to adopt any harsh measure like implantation of AFSPA in Punjab. Otherwise the latest resurgence of Khalistan is a political cause after the Khalistan movement leadership has matured by three decades of beating and persecution by the Indian state.

Indian held Kashmir is also not very far from Indian Punjab, where the independence movement by Muslims of Kashmir who form more then 80% of that state has fully matured into a freedom movement recognized globally. The Kashmir separatist movement is however at a major disadvantage being a Muslim freedom struggle. Being a Muslim freedom struggle in Hindu majority state of India, Kashmir and her Muslims are dispensable through AFSPA. But when it comes to Sikhs in Indian Punjab, they might be a minority, but they form the trade mark brand of united India with all the Sikh turbans being flashed around the globe to create the Indian identity. Moreover, Indian Sikhs are an influential class and forms the backbone of Indian Armed Forces. This situation leaves very little to no room for the Indian state to apply their high handed tactic like AFSPA to neutralize the resurgence of Khalistan.

If we study the response of Indian educated middle class and their reaction to the political awakening in Indian Punjab with regards to the Khalistan issue, two major reactions may be observed. First you will find the argument that is all Pakistan's fault that Khalistan is even an issue in India for the Sikhs, and second argument which is equally absurd is where the Indian middle class completely denies the issue even exists but is just an excuse by the Punjabi population to avoid facing issues like drug abuse and corruption in Punjab. On the contrary to the Indian thoughts, Khalistan has grown to become the mainstream political issue in Punjab which will greatly influence the Assembly elections there in 2017.

 The Khalistan leadership has evidently evolved and is mature enough to separate the armed struggle for Khalistan in the past from the political movement for khalistan and the strategy is paying them rich div-dents. Under the Indian constitution and law a political struggle which does not challenge the writ of the government through armed resistance like in the past cannot be made to shut up through force. The question of recognition of Sikhism as a separate religion from Hinduism and the Indian state persecution of the Sikh community supporting Khalistan in the 1980s and 1990s are deep rooted issues, how so ever they may be denied by the modern Indian middle classes.

 Pakistan lost its influence and seized support to the Khalistan movement once the government of Benazir Bhutto back stabbed the Khalistan movement by surrendering the name of  prominent under cover Sikh freedom fighters to Rajiv Ghandi. These Sikh leaders who were supported by Pakistan during the khalistan insurgency were mercilessly eliminated along with their families by the Indian state.

This time around, the Khalistan movement is essentially political in nature focusing on core Sikh nationalistic issues deeply influenced from the Khalistan liberation movement of the recent past. This political movement will only gain momentum on the basis of regionalism and identity issues. If tried to be thwarted by high handed use of illogical means by Indian state and her pseudo nationalist crowd, the Khalistan movement may bloom out to be a full scale insurgency once more. However, this time round if it happens, the Indian state won't be able to afford to quash any such insurgency, keeping in view the information technology age and international pressures resulting from such free flow of information beside the strong Sikh global community.

In coming years, Indian state will have to accord more autonomy to the Sikhs if they need them to stay in the Indian union. Sikhs have a long and glorious traditions of ruling united India and self rule forms part of their religion too. Hundred of thousands of Sikh, essentially the youth participate in the Khalistan political rallies, which may be ignored by the Hindu majority in India, but the Indian Punjab remains the home grounds of the Sikh community who are the one that really matter with regards the fate and atmosphere on these strategic lands in the Indian union.

India can not indefinitely ignore the issues like Khalistan and Kashmir. These are genuine indigenous issues like the Maoist insurgency and likewise separatist movements in India. There is a limit for any state for quashing the legitimate demands of their population through force alone. Pakistan proved the point in case where the use of force alone failed to suppress the Indian funded and fully supported insurgency in Baluchistan. However, at present Baluchistan is all together a different story with all walks of Baluchi people forming part of the reformation process in the Pakistani province. Pakistan achieved this seemingly impossible task in the face of all adversity through pardoning the Baluch separatists as a one time measure and reintegrating them into the fabric of society. Baluch nationalist leadership was brought into the executive fold of the provincial government to allow them to achieve what all they desired for the progress of their people. Its an ongoing process, however, Pakistan achieved their goal while blunting the Indian efforts and investments to destabilize Pakistan.

If India fails to learn her lessons and keep on pursuing the agenda of "Akhand Baharat" through any means at their disposal like the Ajit Doval theories, it will only backfire in the face of Indian state reversing the progress India made economically and elsewhere. Khalistan like Kashmir and other Indian separatist movements are a reality at place in India. These are quintessential Indian fault lines waiting to be exploited or exploded by the forces within and outside India if Indian state keeps on ignoring them and brushing the same under the carpet through stereotype response using brute force.

Khalistan movement in its present form is a political movement spearheaded by well linked and highly groomed Sikh leadership with global connections. Sikh nation can not be ignored by Indian state and the khalistan political movement's leadership will exploit the bad governance of Punjabi/Sikh politicians currently holding provincial powers there. The adverse state of governance, and related issues including rampant drug abuse problems will be used for political point scoring by the Khalistan leadership to gain ascendancy in the Provincial politics. This will eventually bring them into provincial government. From there on, it would be out of the control of Indian state to dictate terms to Khalistan leadership and many more allowances will have to be accorded to Khalistan political leadership meeting their demands. This would provide a legitimate precedence to the Kashmir and other freedom struggles in India to follow suit.

 Indian federation will have to decentralize her draconian hold over the masses it rules and accord their legitimate demands while their external desires of regional hegemony through direct and indirect interference in neghbouring states will have to be subsided if ever India wish a prosperous future for her indigenous population. India may think that using her newly fond fortunes, they can buy influence in the region and stir trouble for those states in the region not towing their lines. But all such actions have serious and equal repercussions, for nation-states fight for their survival especially once cornered through force. Playing with fire always and forever have harmful repercussions as Pakistanis found out after the end of cold war once their own trained and funded Jihadist turned on them. India is likewise funding and making their own Frankenstein which would eventually come back to haunt them.

Khalistan political struggle aims to provide the distinct identity to the Sikh nation who ruled India and parts of Afghanistan in not so distant past. By doing so, khalistan leadership is only directed towards gaining momentum and further support adding misery to the Indian desires of total hegemony in South Asia and countering the rise of China as a super power. India has enough fault-lines of its own which may be exploited by her enemies if India persists to follow the policies of confrontation with her neighbours like China and Pakistan. Movements like Khalistan and Kashmir beside several other separatist struggles in India are the valid fault-lines waiting to be exploited by those who India antagonizes with their clandestine tactics taught by their political guru, "Chankiya". However, the great political philosopher of subcontinent also said, Learn from the mistakes of others, you can't live long enough to make them all yourself. India needs to learn from the Pakistani experience of playing with fire when they created the Jihadists alongside USA to counter USSR. The same lot came back to burn Pakistan in blood and fire while Pakistan continuously struggle to fight their Frankenstein while trying to reverse the ideology which created the monster in the first place. Pakistan also failed to quell the Baluchistan insurgency funded by India through Iran, until the time they abandoned the use of brute force and initiated a political process. This political process engulfed all the nationalist and separatist leadership with their pawns into the Pakistani national fabric knowing the perks of being part of a strong nation-state. India needs to realize that by alienating the nationalist causes like Khalistan and Kashmir, it won't achieve positive results for the Indian state, but doing the exact opposite would surely bound the separatist leaders in the Indian national fiber. Concessions will have to be made, and the same concessions would form the capital on which everlasting peace in the entire region would be founded ensuing an era of prosperity for all in the most populous region of the world.         

                              

 


    

           

Sunday, 20 March 2016

Recent Wave of Terrorism in Turkey

When President Putin of Russia warned Turkey, that they will " more than once" regret, shooting down the Russian war plane, perhaps he was hinting at the tirade of deadly terrorist attacks currently going on in Turkey. Turkey is apparently being targeted by ISIS, the terrorist group and simultaneously by Kurd rebels who are ironically enemies of each other. Now ISIS is a common enemy of Russia and Turkey who are newly found enemies themselves after the Turks unwisely decided to shoot down the Russian jet. However, Kurd rebels are open to all support they can get against the Turkish state especially after Turk President Recep Tayyip Erdogan banished all kinds of dialogue for conflict resolution with the Kurd populations demand for further autonomy.

The Islamist government of Turkey bears a striking resemblance to the Islamic ideological regimes of President Zia in Pakistan and Khomeini of Iran. These regimes displayed strict fundamentalist governance practices, curbing freedom of speech and punishing any difference of opinion. Their adherence to respective Islamic ideological beliefs alienated the moderates in both countries and brought upon them decades of militancy leading to terrorism. We can continuously discuss both Pakistan and Iran's case but let's bring to focus the current Islamist regime in Turkey, led by Erdogan. It is clearly evident that Erdogan is alienating even the moderate Turk Kurdish population by branding them as terrorists for opposing his government's harsh anti-terror policy directed  in essence at the Kurd population. Turkey has so far indicted three prominent academics for speaking up against the government's anti-terror policy. The Turkish government is also reluctant to talk to the Kurds due to the fact that the USA supports the Syrian Kurds, who recently declared independence of three Syrian districts under their control. President Erdogan doesn't seem to want to send the USA the wrong signal, that they agree and accept the US support for the Syrian Kurds by liaising with the Turkish Kurds. In all this complex set of geopolitics;  the uncompromising fundamentalist attitudes of  the Turkish state are not helping Turkey in the slightest.

In the present moment both the US and the EU desperately want Turkish cooperation in which the US utilizes Turkish military bases for their Syrian campaign and the EU put in place a deal to pay 6 billion US dollars to Turkey for stopping the unstoppable flow of Syrian migrants to Europe. Turkey would not be under any pressure from the champions of "human rights" for her out lash against their Kurd population or anyone criticizing the state's strict policies in this regard. However, keeping in line with the same practices of  hard line Islamist regimes of the past like that of President Zia in Pakistan, one can easily conclude the outcome in the longer run for Turkey. Turkey will pay the price in human lives and loss of tourism affecting the economy for taking on Russia. In the process, by alienating the moderate forces, the Turkish government is paving the way for the rise of fundamentalist forces which will ultimately breed militancy and a culture of intolerance and hate.

Until and unless the Turkish people force their leadership to take a recourse in addressing the core security policies of the Turkish government, we are looking at further chaos and economic hardships for Turkey. In the long run, if the trend started by the Turkish state continues, it would endanger the very fabric of Turkish culture formulated by Kemal Ataturk. It is advisable for Turkey to tread carefully in this situation. The country is an up and rising star in the Muslim world and any Muslim with enlightened religious orientation has many hopes for them and wishes them well.

            

Thursday, 3 March 2016

The Tragedy of Pakistani Nationalist Mindset

The upper middle class happens to be the most influential segment of the Pakistani population who have a significant influence on the thought process of the policy makers in this country. The same class also happens to be educated enough for being well versed in the ways of the world. What shocked me in the last couple of days and jolted me to my senses was the reaction of the majority to Pakistani director Sharmeen Obaid Chinoy getting an Oscar for the short documentary she made on honour killings in Pakistan.

At an official level the documentary got kudos by the Pakistani government while it was played at the PM house and the prime minister formed a national task force for woman's empowerment. However, the nationalists of Pakistan saw it as something bringing shame to Pakistan by depicting the ugly side of the Pakistani society. Despite the fact that the Oscar for best movie this year went to a film which showed the biggest ever global child sexual abuse scandal by organized clergy in the US, the Pakistani hard-line patriots decided to bash the only Pakistani who won the Oscar not once, but twice. This false sense of pride indicates the deep rooted problem within the  Pakistani upper middle class, which prefers to remain oblivious to the ground realities in their country and instead of raising voices to bring an end to the disgusting chauvinistic attitudes in the country, wants to keep it business as usual with a "happy go lucky" attitude towards life in their surroundings. Its understandable that the majority of them wants the beautiful side of Pakistani society and her natural beauty to be showcased around the world, but the problem lies where they only want to show all that but brush the ugly realities under the carpet.

The Pakistani society is seriously infested with issues such as domestic violence and general brutality towards women, extremism, Jihadist tendencies of the Pakistani youth, corruption to the core and problems like lack of healthcare facilities, sanitation and above all low literacy and poor education standards for the masses. Pakistani nationalists wants to brush all these issues not under the carpet but address them behind closed doors which is noble by patriotic standards, but has it really ever worked? No is the answer keeping in view the track record of over five decades. Stubborn attitudes like this are one of the reasons why Pakistan happens to be the country with the second worst passport in the world. Pakistan has been made into a laughing stock and is ridiculed by the majority of the world, when they hear Pakistanis bashing people like Sharmeen Obaid for showing the ugly yet true picture of the Pakistani society.

These Pakistani educated masses are not willing to accept the problems deep within their existence like extremism which seriously undermines the efforts and sacrifices of Pakistani people and their military to purge the rein of terror from Pakistan which has already cost more then a hundred thousand precious Pakistani lives.

These attitudes attuned to "All is Well"/Sab Acha mantra is in essence what's really damaging and poses to be the biggest hurdle in sorting out the deep rooted corruption and injustice in the Pakistani society which breeds extremism in the Pakistani society.

The eyes wide shut practice of the Pakistanis who matter allows the injustice to occur through corrupt national practices producing disillusioned youth ripe to be exploited by the extremist segments of the Pakistani society who more then often happen to be the militant arms of the Pakistani Clergy (Mullahcracy)

The Pakistani moderates with nationalistic aspirations are the definite reason why the process of fundamental reformation in the Pakistani society has been stalled for decades. They want to somehow remove the tumor from a patients body without having to operate. It makes you wonder what they are really thinking.

Pakistani society suffers from a definite issue of extremism which won't ever be resolved until the Pakistani nationalist does not let go of his extremist tendency to kill any critique directed at the Pakistani society. The society will only be purged of the issues threatening to destroy the very fabric of this culture if they are allowed to be openly debated without the fear of persecution. If this attitude continues,Pakistan will keep on facing tragedies like Salman Taseer and psychotic fanatics like Mumtaz Qadri.

Pakistanis need to allow the ideals of their founding father reshape the contours of Pakistani civil society. Muhammad Ali Jinnah was himself a progressive and modern man who was open to debate of any sort and the same debate won us this country. Let's never forget that and encourage all possible critical critique while directing it to reform the ugly aspects of Pakistani society instead of brushing them under the carpet.